Archive for the ‘Financial crisis & recession’ Category

Pushback on ‘TBTF’

September 15, 2009

Propping up banks that are “too big to fail” with taxpayers’ capital doesn’t improve the US financial system or benefit bank customers – it just concentrates more power in the hands of a few giant institutions – Tom Hoenig, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, argues in this week’s Barron’s.

Noting that the 20 largest US banks already own 70% of the banking system’s assets, Hoenig says combining failing banks into bigger institutions only increases that concentration – in turn, further concentrating risk in a few megabanks.

Congress might consider whether the centralization of banking is a good thing as it takes up regulatory reform this fall. At this point, President Obama’s regulatory proposal seems to accept the “TBTF” mantra that has governed US policy so far – proposing to deal with the concentration of risk in megabanks by incrementally increasing their capital requirements, then taking them over after they fail.

Hoenig, the Federal Open Market Committee’s longest-serving member, doesn’t think TBTF is a healthy policy:

“I’ve seen banks close for making mistakes,” says Hoenig. “I’ve seen other banks too big for the regulators, being supported by the U.S. taxpayer. It’s harmful to the infrastructure, and sends the wrong message, that influence is what really matters. If we fail to address ‘too big to-fail,’ it will only get worse.”

Hoenig warns of “an oligarchy of interest” linking megabanks and the Washington power powers-that-be who use government policy to sustain them. Instead, Hoenig advocates more market discipline, decentralization and competition. Now there’s a radical idea for reform. But will it play in Washington?

Earnings giggle

August 10, 2009

For a bit of comic relief check out “Mad Lib Earnings,” an all-too-true parody of earnings releases and the obligatory wire service stories that cover them. It’s Stanley Bing’s column on the last page of the August 17, 2009, Fortune magazine.

Bing’s fill-in-the-blanks earnings release makes our job easy. There’s a boilerplate quote from the CEO complete with an overwrought metaphor:

“These are tough times,” said Bob Boberts, chief executive officer of Big Fat Company. “Tough times call for tender chickens, and ours are the juiciest in what is, right now, a lean and stringy sector.”

We can choose between reporting a decline or “sad little incline” in second-quarter revenue. There’s a nod to cost cutting in “the elimination of nondairy creamer in offices nationwide.” Some optimistic-without-saying-much words from the COO.

And a wire service story, appearing five seconds after the release, offers jewels like:

“Results, schmesults,” said a quote monkey from an investment bank who’s always available to validate assumptions. “We’re going to downgrade them anyhow …”

I think we  know that sell side analyst who always take the reporters’ calls. And as a former newspaperman, I can enjoy the satire on journalism’s craft – we used to call quickie news stories with instant analysis “three phone calls and a cloud of dust.”

So there you have it. Investor relations and the financial news media continue getting the word out, for better or worse. We need a chuckle now and then.

Transparency in troubled times

August 7, 2009

Devoting more time to investors and communicating data to support what you’re saying are among the take-home messages McKinsey & Company consultants heard when they interviewed CEOs of 14 major companies recently for a report on Leadership Lessons for Hard Times.

Jay Fishman, Chairman and CEO of Travelers, weighs in on both the commitment and the content for investor relations in a challenging time:

If I’ve learned anything in the last 18 months, it’s that transparency in troubled times really matters. …

If asked to describe this or that exposure, the advice from many IR departments is to use some formulation that basically says don’t worry. I’ve tried to resist that. Now is not the time to tell people not to worry. If you’re in the financial services industry, you ought to be able to quantify. I try to be specific, and weve gained credibility as a result.

“Not the time to tell people not to worry” – I like that. Instead, give investors the data that leads you to your outlook. And let them decide whether to worry.

CFOs: The future looks hazy

August 1, 2009

The good news is chief financial officers at the world’s top companies are a tad more optimistic than last quarter about when recovery will kick in and start benefitting their businesses, according to the Duke University/CFOGlobal Business Outlook Survey” reported in the magazine’s July-August 2009 issue.

CFO Survey July-Aug 09

Duke/CFO survey 2009

The bad news is – well, let’s skip over the CFOs’ plans to continue cutting workforces and capital spending. Underlying the bad news are two findings:

  • Most CFOs do not expect the US economy to begin recovery at least until 2010. The breakdown: 43% see an upturn starting in 2009, 50% in 2010 and 7% in 2011 or later. No wonder companies are still cutting costs.
  • The No. 1 concern for CFOs within their own companies remains the ability (or lack of ability) to forecast results. That makes business planning difficult, not to mention forward-looking discussions with investors.

CFO devotes a separate article (“Imperfect Futures“) to troubles companies are having with forecasting. When it comes to predicting the direction of sales or earnings, many more companies are invoking the “u” word – uncertainty. Says CFO:

Forecasting, never an activity companies felt particularly confident about, has now become nearly impossible. Processes that once results in mildly imperfect visions of the future now produce wildly imperfect ones.

The magazine cites some creative approaches, including collaborative efforts to identify new risks companies face in the marketplace, internal forecasting of which suppliers will survive or fail due to the recession, and prediction markets to draw out managers’ true feelings about the results they can deliver going forward.

For investor relations, the hazy economic future and its implications most likely will feed a continued trend away from companies providing specific earnings guidance. It’s even more important, then, for IROs to understand and communicate qualitative information on the key drivers – internal or external – of sales, costs and earnings.

IR & the coming recovery

July 28, 2009

Newsweek-It'sOverThe cover of the latest Newsweek shouts “The Recession Is Over!” A balloon and an exclamation point add emphasis, although writer Daniel Gross layers on the qualifications – making it clear the economy, even if it is at a turning point, remains in turmoil.

For my money, it’s a little premature to celebrate. I’m skeptical of newsweekly covers. And too much pain seems to be lingering – for consumers, workers, capital markets and companies. The sunshine hasn’t broken through enough to banish the dark clouds in favor of sunny days.

Yet a glimmer does shine through, here and there. Recovery will come, maybe soon. And my sense is that investors are looking for signs, seeking each ray of light, asking if good news is coming next quarter, or the next after that.

So investor relations people need to be asking: What’s our recovery strategy? How do we offer forward-looking perspective? What do we say in an uncertain time when we see hope but can’t be sure? And when do we declare recovery has arrived?

Some ideas for you to consider (feel free to add your own as comments):

… Explain the recovery strategy. Our job in IR, any time, is to help investors understand our companies’ strategies for creating value. Right now, shareholders are battered but very much looking forward and wondering what’s next. With more than a little nervousness, they want to know where we go from here.

In a piece called “Beyond Challenging Markets,” the consulting firm Deloitte says shareholder returns vary much more among companies around a recession than in good economic times – that is, some emerge as winners that outperform for investors, while others survive but never quite lift off for shareholders.

Deloitte outlines four stages of strategy for recession and recovery: strengthening the balance sheet, optimizing performance, building confidence and positioning for the future. Most companies have addressed the first two by working to reduce debt and cut costs; now we’re looking forward.

Building confidence as a basis for outperforming in a recovery, Deloitte suggests, may include improving corporate governance; demonstrating a strong approach to anticipating and managing risk; creating realistic expectations and delivering on promises; and responding proactively to the prospect of increasing regulation.

Deloitte says positioning for the future means developing a strategy for achieving near- and intermediate-term growth in existing businesses; changing the business model where markets or conditions have changed (e.g., ongoing credit limitations or sluggish consumer spending); and expanding through M&A or new products.

The consultants’ emphasis is that CEOs and senior management should be doing the work of strategy formation for the next phase of the economy. But IROs, equally, should be taking on the job of explaining strategy for what’s coming next.

… Give historical perspective. One of the best ways to talk about the future is to talk about the past. In today’s Wall Street Journal, Justin Lahart analyzes “the Great Recession” in comparison to eight decades of economic slumps (with cool interactive graphs online, if you’re an Econ nut). Most companies can draw upon experience with past recessions – and the recoveries that followed. So we can speak factually about how recovery tends to work its way through our business.

… Share specialized knowledge. Companies can add value for investors and nurture lasting relationships by sharing industry-specific insights. That means helping investors, especially generalists, understand how the business cycle works its way through your sector, how the competitive landscape is changing, and what special risks or opportunities you see. Your view of the business in which you compete is a valuable perspective to add to the investors’ mosaic.

… Don’t be overly optimistic. A realistic tone, infused with humility, seems to fit the times. Most of us didn’t predict the economic turmoil would be this severe, so we have reason to be cautious about forecasting the strength or timing of recovery.

There are positive signs. Floyd Norris of The New York Times notes: “The index of leading indicators, which signals turning points in the economy, is rising at a rate that has accurately indicated the end of every recession since the index began to be compiled in 1959.” And various industry-specific indicators show upticks.

We could truly be at the bottom, although some business people sound more like they just can’t imagine things getting any worse. The recovery may already be underway. Or, as Norris says, we may be entering the first upstroke in a W-shaped recovery, only to face a second downturn of unknown severity.

To be clear, I’m not trying to call an economic recovery – or deny it. My point is that as IR people we need to be thinking and communicating about the coming recovery, probably without predicting the timing.

When should we declare that recovery has arrived? Personally, I favor a factual approach that keeps investors current on company or industry-specific indicators, including third-party economic data. And then I would suggest waiting to break out the champagne until actual results start to show improving sales and profits.

That’s when investors will start breathing easier.

© Copyright 2009 Johnson Strategic Communications Inc.

Overconfidence on Wall Street

July 23, 2009

“Wall Street is a confidence game, in the strictest sense of that phrase.”

- Malcolm Gladwell, “Cocksure”
The New Yorker, July 27, 2009

One of the best storytellers writing today about financial and economic topics, Malcolm Gladwell, takes a shot at Wall Street’s overconfidence in the current New Yorker. It’s one of the wittier dissections of the financial crisis that I’ve seen.

The specific targets are Bear Stearns and Jimmy Cayne, the failed investment bank’s former CEO. If you’re weary of retrospectives on those two subjects, this piece might serve as one last thing to read about them. Along the way, Gladwell weaves together readable tales of overconfidence in war and other settings.

All this has, well, not very much to do with investor relations – except perhaps as a cautionary tale if your boss or you are among those who might earn a label of “cocksure.” But Gladwell offers up an insightful, if uncomplimentary, look behind the curtain on Wall Street. The New Yorker, of course, supplies the cartoons.

‘Macro’ drives ‘micro’

July 1, 2009

The headline of the day, in my book, comes in a post on the Wall Street Journal Real Time Economics blog marking the arrival of July 1:

It’s The Second Half — So Where’s The Recovery?

Investor relations professionals may feel the same ambivalence today, as we enter the back half of the year wondering about macroeconomic trends and seeing the big picture’s influence on our companies’ fundamentals (and stock prices).

Investors are trying awfully hard to be there waiting on the dock when the good ship Recovery pulls in. So the market rallies … when Ford’s sales drop only 11% (the best of the automakers) … when manufacturing shrinks, but less than it has been declining for the past year … when unemployment keeps rising but probably at a slower pace. In a market eager to be hopeful, exuberance seems to come cheaply.

Anyway, the second half has arrived – and  let’s hope recovery really is at hand.

One of the challenges of investor communication is to explain how the business cycle works its way through industry and company-specific performance. We need to offer insight into how our P&Ls are affected by changes in product demand, sales volumes, pricing power, cost of materials and so on – and the timing of these changes within the economic cycle. Part of this is saying which “macro” metrics matter to our businesses – and providing the data for our shareholders.

IR people should be students of the macro environment (among other things). Three good sources on the dismal science are blogs that aggregate and report the daily economic news: Calculated Risk, The Big Picture and WSJ’s Real Time Economics. Following all three, of course, could be too dismal for most of us.

Another challenge for IR is to understand how our companies diverge from the economy as a whole. We must explain actions we’re taking to outperform, smooth the cycles or propel the recovery of our P&Ls beyond the macro trend.

The next couple of quarters promise to be interesting. Happy H2!

Quote, unquote – Wishing for ‘flat’

February 3, 2009

“Flat is the new up.”

- W. Russell Welsh, president,
Polsinelli Shalton Flanigan Suelthaus law firm
quoted in The Kansas City Star, Feb. 3, 2009, p. D15

Although Kansas City lawyer Russ Welsh is discussing the state of the legal biz amid the recession, he captures the mood that many industries – and the financial markets – are feeling in this economic winter.

Regulation Redux – a risk for 2009

January 26, 2009

As Congress and the new President grapple with the economic crisis, one outcome seems certain: re-regulation of US businesses.

Regulation Redux is at hand, and investor relations people need to think about how to discuss changing regulatory risks with shareholders. No doubt, upcoming 10-Ks should address the surge in regulatory activism. CEOs should be prepared to speak plainly about the evolving environment.

With the economic cycle causing pain on a massive scale – what folks in Washington call “market failure” – politicians are in full fix-it mode. At his inauguration, President Obama voiced confidence in steering government and skepticism about leaving business to its own devices:

The question we ask today is not whether our government is too big or too small, but whether it works … Nor is the question before us whether the market is a force for good or ill. Its power to generate wealth and expand freedom is unmatched, but this crisis has reminded us that without a watchful eye, the market can spin out of control …

I think it’s fair to say the opposite of out of control is under control. The administration and Congress are looking at many sectors to bring under control. Some examples:

  • Banking. Many of America’s banks have a new shareholder in Uncle Sam. And just as Carl Icahn may have a few ideas for management when he buys into your company, it’s a cinch that Barney Franks, Tim Geithner and others are going to start writing new rules for banks. Attacking executive pay and cutting dividends to a cent is just the start.
  • Autos. Different bailout, same basic deal. Accepting the big bucks means making adjustments to satisfy the folks who sign the checks. Today’s announcement that Obama’s EPA may encourage stricter limits on greenhouse gases from cars and trucks points the way. My guess is the auto bailout will usher in policies that perpetuate the US industry’s uneconomical cost structure and subsidize politically correct cars.
  • Healthcare. Reform, a popular campaign promise in ’08, will be very expensive if it means universal coverage. Amid many fiscal demands, the low-hanging fruit of healthcare reform in ’09 may be regulations aimed at cutting costs to consumers. We might expect, say, tougher federal negotiation on drug prices and genericization of biotech drugs. Or maybe new rules to assure “fairness” in health insurance.
  • Securities markets. Amid the rush for bailouts, giant investment banks have accepted a tighter regulatory regime by converting to commercial banks. Next on the agenda is an effort to fix what many see as the SEC’s failure to prevent the meltdown of 401(k)s, implosion of Wall Street and notorious frauds exposed by the bear market. Even the Republicans last year proposed a major expansion of regulatory powers, revamping the SEC and perhaps the CFTC and Federal Reserve. A couple of likely regulatory targets: derivatives and hedge funds.
  • Labor. The Employee Free Choice Act, endorsed by Obama, would change the rules for achieving union representation. If the law is enacted, labor will be able to organize workers by soliciting signatures on cards rather than submitting to secret-ballot elections. The likelihood poses a risk to companies in healthcare, manufacturing, retailing and other services.
  • Energy and environment. Companies that are heavy energy users or impact the environment are accustomed to disclosure of risks on those issues. Legislative and regulatory changes will be on the watch list.
  • Taxes. A weak economy puts tax increases on the back burner and tax cuts, even for business, front and center. But there is tension between a desire for stimulus and an impulse to take away business “breaks.” Risks remain, amid soaring deficits, that efforts to capture more revenue may come at the expense of investors or unpopular industries.

Obviously, I’m no expert in policy challenges for specific industries. But I do know IR people need to talk to our companies’ experts about Washington and what may be coming our way.

Feel free to offer your own comments on regulatory risks and how we should discuss them with investors. (Comments can be anonymous.)

© Copyright 2009 Johnson Strategic Communications Inc.

Lacking visibility in the corner office

January 21, 2009

What worries Chief Financial Officers most about their companies? Inability to forecast results is the No. 1 concern internally, according to the CFO Magazine/Duke University Global Business Outlook survey. Results are reported in the January 2009 issue of CFO (online here).

That lack of visibility, of course, makes life hard for investor relations: IR can offer less forward-looking information in the current malaise.

Externally, weak consumer demand and the credit crunch are causing CFOs to lose the most sleep. A majority of 1,275 finance officers polled aren’t even expecting recovery to start at least until the fourth quarter. Some 39% can’t see a recovery beginning until 2010 or later.

Albeit without much faith in their own forecasts, CFOs are predicting an average 8% drop in earnings in 2009.

In response, the finance execs expect to reduce work forces 5% on average this year. They plan to cut capital expenditures more than 10%, marketing and advertising 7%, and IT spending 4%. Specific plans along those lines might provide forward-looking tidbits that management is willing to share – even as the overall earnings outlook seems more elusive.

Characterizing the uncertainties – the lack of visibility – may be more valuable to investors than giving guidance that turns out to be wrong.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.