Archive for the ‘Bear market IR’ Category

IPO? Maybe next year, or … or …

October 16, 2008

Initial public offerings, of course, aren’t exactly catching fire in 2008. Nearly twice as many IPOs have been withdrawn or postponed year-to-date (80) as have been completed (just 43 globally), according to Renaissance Capital‘s IPO Home research through October 15. The lucky companies sold shares in January or February. Around the Ides of March, things got ugly with the demise of Bear Stearns – and they haven’t improved.

Not only is the number of IPOs down 77% from a year earlier, the dollar volume is off, too. IPO Home estimates $27.8 billion worth of IPOs have priced so far in 2008, less than half the 2007 total. And close to two-thirds of the $27.8 this year came from one giant offering: Visa, back in March. Only one IPO other than Visa topped a billion dollars, and the median of the 43 offerings listed by IPO Home was $157 million.

There’s always next year. Or, if the last IPO drought is an indication, maybe 2011. Quality deals may still make it, but simplicity and a well-defined risk profile will be cornerstones of IPO stories for awhile.

From Wall Street to Zero Street

October 10, 2008

Weekends have turned into a time when once-proud financial institutions are vaporized. Usually, they don’t go completely to zero, so “vaporized” may be too strong. But they are banished to someplace far from their former glories. They move from Wall Street to Zero Street.

The new residents of Zero Street already are too numerous to name. We don’t know who else may move there, or if any will come back.

For public companies accustomed to enjoying financial support from Wall Street, walking down Zero Street looking for capital won’t be much fun. The credit crisis and bear market are real and dangerous. Wall Street already was changing before 2008, but by the time 2009 arrives, we will be dealing with a dramatically different financial community.

As investor relations professionals, we need to be studying these changes and thinking through implications for our companies. Among the trends we might consider:

… Shrinking sell-side. Already consolidating before the crisis, the future Wall Street will not have nearly the number of I-banks and analysts. Whether the survivors are more powerful or less, we’ll see.

… Bruised buy-side. The universe of investors, institutional and individual, will surely be more cautious, distrustful and risk-averse going forward. At least for awhile.

… Growing government. Washington is becoming an owner and lender to so many big institutions, we can expect a push for massive expansion of regulation in banking and investment relationships.

… Punitive actions. Bear markets always lead to nasty hearings on Capitol Hill, allowing Congress to place blame somewhere else, plus criminal prosecutions for behaviors that might be civil matters in better times. Not that wrongdoers should ever get off, but justice can turn into vengeance.

… Real economic impact. For most of us, the biggest concern is not what the market does near-term, but what the debt and equity crises (and reactions to them) do to our companies’ ability to compete and grow in the future. And we can’t predict that.

I’ve offered some thoughts on potential IR messages and tactics in a bear market (here and here). And I welcome any ideas you might contribute to this conversation.

Text & photos © Copyright 2008
Johnson Strategic Communications Inc.

More on bear market IR

October 7, 2008

Over on IR Web Report, a consistently informative source on all things online, Dominic Jones kindly refers readers to this blog (see Oct. 6 post) – and adds his own useful insights. He endorses the value of staying in front of investors but notes that the Web offers new, low-cost ways to do so:

Technologies like blogs, podcasts, vodcasts and Twitter enable everyone from the CEO to workers on the shop floor to tell the company’s story. And often their voices, real and unrefined by the corporate PR machine, have much more credibility than sanitized, over-massaged press releases.

Putting a human face on the corporation, he adds, is critical:

… if you want to give your company an edge in this market, you’d do well to remember that investors are also buying into a business run by real peopleGet those people out in front of investors, not just in person in small group meetings or one-on-ones, but out on the web as well.

My thought is that IROs might take advantage of a depressed time (and the CEO/CFO’s reluctance to go on the road and meet depressed investors?) by moving forward with IR 2.0. Dominic’s blog archive is a good place to start researching more interactive forms of communication – and preparing a case for management and legal to embrace the trend toward online IR.

Bear market IR – is it different?

October 6, 2008

So the bear growls, claws, gnaws and gets most of us down – measured either by our emotional states or the stock prices that stare back at us from our screens. The S&P 500 is down 32% from a year ago. The Wall Street Journal must be running out of synonyms: shock, shake, mess, slide, crisis, meltdown, turmoil, crunch, plunge …

So far we haven’t seen Time or Newsweek cover stories pronouncing the “death of the stock market” – a traditional sign of investor capitulation and a bottom – so it’s a fair bet the negative environment will be with us awhile, despite the occasional bounce. No doubt more bad news awaits.

Accordingly, here are 10 ideas on doing investor relations in a bear market. Nothing unique or magical – a difficult market is by definition, well, difficult – but here are the thoughts of one IR guy who has been through a few market cycles:

… Stay visible (or get out there). Sure, it’s hard to tell a happy story when everyone’s scared to death. But a happy story isn’t the goal. At some point investors, especially professionals who may be keeping their powder dry right now, will be back in the buying mood. They should be getting to know you now.

… Be factual in your tone. The market ascribes credibility to executives who lay out the facts in a pretty blunt way. Presentations and publications should be fact-laden, not flashy, funny or visionary. You’re giving people data to evaluate your company in the midst of a fearful time. Their view of the broader market environment probably will determine when they’re in a buying mood, anyway.

… Don’t be quick to make promises. Suppose the financial turmoil turns into a real recession (as economists, not politicians, define it). Consumer spending could go in the tank and stay there. Business investment may be on hold. Earnings could go worst-case. Guidance based on economic assumptions may go awry – so at least lay out the assumptions for investors, if you’re going to forecast results or major events in the future.

… Do tell the long-term story. In spite of complaining about short-termism in the stock market, many CEOs and CFOs talk to investors as if the latest quarter, or the next, is the biggest deal for shareholders. You should ask, what is the key message? What will drive the value of this company? Odds are, it has to do with business trends that span several years, competitive position, innovative strategy and the like.

… Discuss the balance sheet. When investors are valuing stocks on their growth prospects, it’s about the P&L. But when the issue is survival, people need to understand the size and nature of the assets, and the size and nature of the liabilities. Safety (or lack of it) is found in the balance sheet.

… Give the bad with the good. Nothing erodes the trust of investors as much as management being in denial. Running the “sunshine pump” or trying to gloss over bad results damages a company’s credibility. Acknowledging problems and defining a plan of action builds confidence.

… Refute rumors quickly with the facts. As several of the Wall Street collapses have shown, rumors can aggravate business problems by undercutting the confidence of customers and investors. More than ever, a bear market is a time to monitor online and market “chatter” – and correct anything erroneous.

… Coordinate investor and media relations. It’s a small world. When a reporter is working on a story, he’ll call analysts and investors (friendly or unfriendly) looking for insight. And investors, in turn, pay attention to what the media says about a company. Companies should speak with one voice, and IR and PR should coordinate daily to plan responses on any issues lurking in the market.

… Polish up your Q&A. The issues are myriad: credit crunch, recession, your industry trend, consumer pullbacks, job cuts, commodity prices, political uncertainty, regulatory changes in the air. Best practices for IR include preparing a document with answers to the market’s most likely questions and concerns, running them through senior management and legal counsel, and distributing these messages to everyone in-house who answers questions from investors and the media.

… The story is the business, not the stock price. For anxious shareholders, the most urgent issue right now may be the amount of money they’re down on their investment. But for the company and more seasoned investors, the question is where the business stands today – and what management is doing for the future. Regardless of the drama in the stock market, for IROs the business is the message.

© Copyright 2008 Johnson Strategic Communications Inc.

When fear stalks …

September 29, 2008

An investor relations professional needs perspective.

Of course, it’s hard to make much progress with a company’s growth story, or any story, in a market environment controlled by fear.

Probably the main tasks of an IRO right now are (1) to quickly and proactively answer investors’ urgent questions or concerns as they relate to his or her own company and (2) if the IRO can find any time away from the phone, to think and plan ahead for telling the story once the din of ambulance and fire engine sirens begins to recede.

I am reminded of a psychology lesson from Benjamin Graham in The Intelligent Investor. Graham notes that either the whole market or an individual stock can fall prey to the stalking fears of the crowd:

In the depths of a depressed or “bear” market, the average person can see no ray of light ahead and can think only in terms of worse to come. So too, when an individual company or industry begins to lose ground in the economy, Wall Street is quick to assume that its future is entirely hopeless and it should be avoided at any price. The two types of reasoning are similar and equally fallacious.

Long-term investors know this, of course. They are out there surveying the wreckage for potential values, at least considering when the trend will turn and stocks of great companies will be a “buy.” As IR people, we ought to ask that same question about the companies we work with – and build our story around the information those investors need to find real value.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.